[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Header re-write
On Wed, 15 Feb 1995, Scott Schwartz wrote:
> > I don't understand your point.
>
> My point is that in 2.2 the localnames file had a single, simple,
> useful, function. In 2.99 it has some different function, with
> different rules, and no compelling motivation for any of those
> changes.
The way localnames works now is more useful. I use it. The
differences between the old localnames and the new is easier to summarize
than the differences between IDA and V8.
> As long as I'm flaming, let me mention that I was one of Rayan's
> original beta-testers, back in the ancient days when psuvax1 was still
> a vax 11/780. Even then Zmailer was more stable than 2.99 seems to be.
Have you used 2.99?
The real problem with 2.99, is the lack of workers. Zmailer needs
more patches/docs and less flames.
Tom
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Header re-write
- From: Scott Schwartz <schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu> (Thu, 16 Feb 1995 06:44:55 +0200)
- Re: Header re-write
- From: James MacKinnon <jmack@phys.ualberta.ca> (Thu, 16 Feb 1995 07:12:59 +0200)