[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Own db of blocked IPs



what about using nsupdate (with bind9)?

El 27 Jan 2004 a las 19:44, Jeff Warnica escribió:

> 
> BIND 9 apparently has support for alternative backends, though I have no idea
> how well they work, or how much C coding would be required to get it working
> with your system... BIND may be the most popular DNS server out their, and may
> have the most features, but it may not be the best for this purpose... Its
> extensive security, distrubtion and other advanced features likely wont be
> necessary.. (I dont think they are necessaty for 95% of the systems running
> BIND  anyway....)
> 
> There are a number of existing alternates to BIND which support SQL backends,
> but unless you happen to be using the same schema, they may or may not beable
> to just read your DB.
> 
> I see that there is a Perl DNS server module...
> 
> http://www.stanford.edu/~riepel/lbnamed/Stanford-DNSserver/DNSserver.html
> 
> Making your own DNS server with a hundred line perl script might be the path of
> least resistance.
> 
> Quoting Marek Kowal <marek.kowal@portal.onet.pl>:
> 
> > Thank's for the prompt replies.
> >
> > If I am to go to the RBL, I need to have the DNS which can use the SQL
> > database as the source of records. I have (really!) about 10 seconds from
> > the detection of "tricky" IP to the next connection attempt, and during that
> > time my DNS needs to start to serve those IPs as blocked.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > .m
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 9:59 PM
> > To: Marek Kowal
> > Cc: ZMailer list
> > Subject: Re: Own db of blocked IPs
> >
> > Sounds like using RBL scheme is the easiest way to go...
> > just set up a DNS server serving your blocked IPs !
> >
> > Marek Kowal wrote:
> >
> >> Hi there, I have an external DB of the IPs to be blocked. It is very 
> >> dynamic (up to
> >> 100 new entries per minute) and centralized - many servers should use it.
> > So
> >> the standard Zmailer mechanisms of static blocked IPs are - I guess - no
> >> good to me. I am running out of time, so please, help me with the
> > following:
> >> where in the smtpserver should I implement my lookup so that I can discard
> >> the connection in either of the places:
> >>
> >> - in main smtpserver process, after accept() and before the fork
> >> - in the child smtpserver process
> >>
> >> Please, help me if you can (and I know you do!) ;-) In the meantime I am
> >> digging through the sources myself.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Marek
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi
> >>
> >>
> >
> --
> > Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron@huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi


--
Mariano Absatz
El Baby
----------------------------------------------------------
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi