Rfc822-to-quoted-printable

[Marek Kowal <marek.kowal@portal.onet.pl>]

Hello,

Please, help me with the following issue - my boss is getting furious ;-) I
am experiencing strange problem with our zmailer setup. The test case is as
follows: letter is sent from one machine (pk2, exim) to the other (kps1,
zmailer), then relayed to external computer via the smtp transport agent.

In one case, the letter is sent without any problems. In the other case,
_the_same_ letter has every newline replaced by two newlines (as seen on the
receiving machine), and - when looking into the message source, its contents
are changed to quoted-printable. In the headers I can see:

Received: from pk2.test.onet.pl ([192.168.241.242]:36501 "EHLO
	pk2.test.onet.pl") by kps1.test.onet.pl with ESMTP
	id <S154060AbTKGMFW> convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable; Fri, 7 Nov
2003 13:05:22 +0100

(the replacement takes place)

or

Received: from pk2.test.onet.pl ([192.168.241.242]:45776 "EHLO
	pk2.test.onet.pl") by kps1.test.onet.pl with ESMTP
	id <S171882AbTKGJ4m>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:56:42 +0100

(no translation)

Now the questions are as follows:

1. why has the translation taken place
2. what is the mechanism to decide, when the translation should take place?
Obviously, it does not happen every time, though the message is the same.
3. why the translated letter has another one newline added for each
existing? This is especially worrying. It applies to body only, messages
have single newlines.

Cheers,
Marek

-----Original Message-----
From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:mea@nic.funet.fi] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:49 PM
To: Mariano Absatz
Cc: ZMailer list
Subject: Re: RBLs and TXT RRs



On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:41:16AM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:00:34PM -0300, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > is there any way, when a DNSBL has a TXT informative RR (as well as 
> > the
> > customary A RR), to include the text of that RR in the rejection?
> > 
> > Is there at least a way to _log_ that info when available?
> 
> Without looking into the code right now, I recall that it was written 
> to yield rejection only, when it gets TXT RR.
> 
> It is possible, of course, that over time the code has
> been broken in this regard, and/or the return message is overwritten 
> somehow.

I have been going these thru in a haphazard manner, reading list archive and
wondering if things are really handled or not..

The more I read the related code, the more I think that
'bag' gave me some diff that broke something.

How are you using it ?  Which test attributes ?

> > TIA.
> > Mariano Absatz
> > El Baby

/Matti Aarnio	<mea@nic.funet.fi>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in the
body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi