Re: 2.99.56pre4 config help

[Ambrose LI <acli@ada.dhs.org>]

In article <20030610174655.L27724@nic.funet.fi> you write:

>I do think that current generations of router scripts (and
>script language) are fairly immune to careless script writer,
>and that built-in scripts are safe.  However Ambrose's 2.99.54
>might be another story.

I am now running 2.99.56pre4 at home (the latest tar.gz from
nic.funet.fi); one day ago I was running 2.99.50s11 (not 2.99.54).

At the office we are running 2.99.56-pre1 (or so it claims; that
was a CVS snapshot).

Are these versions (.56pre4 and .56pre1) safe? If they are then
is it fairly safe to re-enable the interactive routing subsystem?

BTW the content filter seems to be running as root. (Perl's
$< and $> are both 0.) Is this normal, is it a bug, or have I
misconfigured my system?

>/Matti Aarnio	<mea@nic.funet.fi>

Best regards,
-- 
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing  <a.c.li@ieee.org>

http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi