[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: problem with relaying

To: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
Subject: Re: problem with relaying
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@trolltech.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:50:32 +0100
Cc: Slawek Zak <zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl>, zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <20010117233346.M14964@nic.funet.fi>
References: <20010117204728.A18783@ia.pw.edu.pl> <20010117222613.L14964@nic.funet.fi> <8766jdor53.fsf@pf39.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl> <20010117233346.M14964@nic.funet.fi>

Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
>    Changeing the script interpret is one of the most difficult things
>    in ZMailer, and this evaluator detail doubly so...  I recall having
>    tried and failed.  Small tweaking there isn't simple, a thorough
>    underlying script-language replacement might be easier, but which ?
>    PERL ?  Python ?  TCL ?  Scheme ?

Is one really needed? How many people edit the zmailer default? I do, but
my change probably would be doable with _any_ zmailer.

--Arnt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: problem with relaying
  - From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@online.ru> (Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:11:51 +0200)

References:
- problem with relaying
  - From: Tomasz Jordan Kruk <T.Kruk@ia.pw.edu.pl>
- Re: problem with relaying
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
- Re: problem with relaying
  - From: Slawek Zak <zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl>
- Re: problem with relaying
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: problem with relaying
Next by Date: Re: problem with relaying
Prev by thread: Re: problem with relaying
Next by thread: Re: problem with relaying
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread