[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)

To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi (zmailer)
Subject: Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)
From: Matus Uhlar <uhlar@ccduck.ke.sanet.sk>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 12:24:01 +0100 (MET )
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961211003137.174g-100000@inorganic5.fdt.net> from "Jon Lewis" at Dec 11, 96 00:41:28 am


-> What about not accepting mail unless it's for local delivery, for an
-> approved non-local site, or from an approved (your local) domain?

This was discussed a while (week or two) here. But nobody (AFAIK) did it
until now...

-- 
 E-mail: Matus.Uhlar@tuke.sk WWW: http://ccsun.tuke.sk/users/uhlar
 IRC: fantomas, TALK: uhlar@ccnews.ke.sanet.sk
 ...and if you think I'm talking for my employer, you're wrong...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no> (Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:29:41 +0200)

References:
- Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)
  - From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Strange message looping
Next by Date: Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)
Prev by thread: Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)
Next by thread: Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread