[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?

To: mea@utu.fi
Subject: Re: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
From: Nicholas_Briggs.PARC@xerox.com
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1993 19:42:37 +0300
cc: zmailer@cs.toronto.edu
In-Reply-to: "mea@utu:fi:Xerox's message of Thu, 5 Aug 1993 01:00:38 PDT"

I believe the best policy is to be as lenient as possible in what you accept
(although it is fair to warn the submitter of problems), but to be strictly
compliant in what you generate.

					\nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
  - From: Felix Lee <flee@guardian.cse.psu.edu> (Thu, 5 Aug 1993 20:09:57 +0300)
- Re: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
  - From: Chris Siebenmann <cks@sys.toronto.edu> (Thu, 5 Aug 1993 23:00:54 +0300)

Prev by Date: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
Next by Date: Re: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
Prev by thread: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
Next by thread: Re: Strict SMTP (RFC-821) compliance or not ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread