[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
Hello,
I have thought hard wether or not to do what
I consider 'sendmailism'; namely removing the
current 'To: some-comment:;' being generated
at the router when no 'To:' header exists, and
replace that by adding sendmail-like 'Apparently-To:'
header at the delivery time at the mailbox (and
perhaps sm) channels.
At the use of the physical delivery address there
are 'interesting' side-effects when somebody uses
procmail et.al. things running on pipes, and the
"user"-field on the receiver definitions tells
that one...
Any opinnions ?
/Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
- From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 22:54:50 +0200)
- Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
- From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods) (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 23:15:16 +0200)
- Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
- From: Florian Overkamp <sim@wit393101.student.utwente.nl> (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 23:36:54 +0200)
- Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
- From: Peter Ziobrzynski <pzi@netmediatech.com> (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 23:53:43 +0200)
- Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
- From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> (Fri, 22 Nov 1996 07:41:14 +0200)