[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
[ On Thu, November 21, 1996 at 22:26:57 (+0200), Matti Aarnio wrote: ]
> Subject: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
>
> I have thought hard wether or not to do what
> I consider 'sendmailism'; namely removing the
> current 'To: some-comment:;' being generated
> at the router when no 'To:' header exists, and
> replace that by adding sendmail-like 'Apparently-To:'
> header at the delivery time at the mailbox (and
> perhaps sm) channels.
I'll vote against "apparently-to:". I don't like it, and I don't think
it is of any real benefit. I do like what Zmailer now does, and I
consider it more correct.
> At the use of the physical delivery address there
> are 'interesting' side-effects when somebody uses
> procmail et.al. things running on pipes, and the
> "user"-field on the receiver definitions tells
> that one...
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you mean procmail doesn't
understand the current zmailer behaviour?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>