Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)

[Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>]

On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, Matti Aarnio wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 	I have thought hard wether or not to do what
> 	I consider 'sendmailism'; namely removing the
> 	current 'To: some-comment:;' being generated
> 	at the router when no 'To:' header exists, and
> 	replace that by adding sendmail-like 'Apparently-To:'
> 	header at the delivery time at the mailbox (and
> 	perhaps sm) channels.

  It is no longer a sendmailism.  Sendmail 8.8.x, by default, adds "To:
undisclosed-recipients:;".  The old behavior can be forced, but the
Operation Guide, warns, "The Apparently-To: header is non-standard and
decpriciated."

Tom