[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smtp problem
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:58:01AM -0300, Trent MacDougall wrote:
> I am seeing the following in an smtp server log:
>
> MAIL From:<trent@infointeractive.com> SIZE=1106
> RCPT To:<user@FAKEADDRESS.net>
> DATA
> 250 Sender <trent@infointeractive.com> and extensions (SIZE=1106) Ok
> 550 Invalid recipient: <user@FAKEADDRESS.net>
> 503 No recipients specified
> # smtp_sync() did yield code 69
> RSET
> 250 Ok resetting state
> MAIL From:<trent@infointeractive.com> SIZE=1106
> RCPT To:<user@FAKEADDRESS.net>
> DATA
> 250 Sender <trent@infointeractive.com> and extensions (SIZE=1106) Ok
> 550 Invalid recipient: <user@FAKEADDRESS.net>
> 503 No recipients specified
> # smtp_sync() did yield code 69
> RSET
>
> Is this part of any standard for the remote end to do this kind of thing?
> It will just loop on the bad address forever and no new mail will ever get
> sent to FAKEADDRESS.net
>
> Our server is running 2.99.52-patch1 and the remote end is running InterMail
> vK.4.02.00.00 by Software.com.
That situation sounds familiar.... Indeed:
2000-01-04 Matti Aarnio <mea@mea.tmt.tele.fi>
* transports/smtp/smtp.c:
If 'DATA' yields '500' series, don't just do RSET + retry
at the same stream. (EX_IOERR)
> I would appreciate any help info you could share. If the remote end is
> breaking the standard I would like to communicate that back to them so that
> they can get it fixed.
> --
> Trent MacDougall @ InfoInterActive Inc.
> Network Administrator @ 902-832-2651
> Trent.MacDougall@InfoInterActive.Com
--
/Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: smtp problem
- From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@trolltech.com> (Wed, 25 Oct 2000 13:46:42 +0300)
- References:
- smtp problem
- From: Trent MacDougall <trent@infointeractive.com>