Re: Questions re Zmail

[Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>]

On Tue, 20 May 1997, Matti Aarnio wrote:

>> >	Actually the 'mailq' can't.  The output IS empty for the case
>> >	of having nothing in the queue, but it LOOKS empty, when the -Q
>> >	option is used at the scheduler.
>> 
>> Then make the output be some characteristic string. It would be nice if
>> mailq would display without the -Q option even if the scheduler
>> uses -Q.
>
>	Ah...  So the 'classical' display could be with some '-D' option
>	(for 'detailed delivery states'), and the default would be this 'Q' ?

No. Put enough intelligence into mailq to recognize what the other end
supports. I have had forgotten -Q a number of times and at first was
very irritated at it.

>> Also does the subscription mechanism to the list work? I have followed
>> instructions but not received any response to my subscribe request.
>
>	It should...  <mailserver@nic.funet.fi> is the canonic location,
>	and I think I have seen successfull uses of the alias:
>		<zmailer-request@nic.funet.fi>

Ok. I have sent another subscribe request.

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---