[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ZMailer does autoconfig -- 2.99.30 is available
- To: Nicholas_Briggs.PARC@xerox.com
- Subject: Re: ZMailer does autoconfig -- 2.99.30 is available
- From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:27:25 +0300 (EET DST)
- Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
- In-Reply-To: <96Jul25.203643pdt."16657(3)"@alpha.xerox.com> from "Nicholas_Briggs.PARC@xerox.com" at Jul 25, 96 08:36:01 pm
> One feature i'd like to see finished, if you haven't already -- it is partly
> there in version 2.2 -- is the "expiryform" option -- the name of the error
> form to use when a message expires; and it should work on the "hold" delivery
> also.
I sensed that lack somewhen back, and created a:
deliveryform=
option, however it is not exactly an "expiryform=" in sense
that I would think of the latter...
(..a while of code browsing, and thinking..)
Well, maybe the 'deliveryform=' is equivalent of the idea
that 'expiryform=' seems to have (in my mind).
In present system it is a bit difficult to define what form
should be used with which error report -- there is only one
'deliveryform=' available for each channel/host match group.
(Though it would work with the 'hold' channel ;) )
Certainly it would make sense to have more versatile macro
capabilities at the message building -- a builtin m4 + nroff ?
(Just something I dream about occasionally)
> Is "maxReceived" settable in the router config file? on a per channel/host
> combination?
Well, sort of -- router/conf.c
It is actually an old variable, but not in pre-emptive use
before now.. It did cause squirrel(), though.
The count of "Received:" headers is done early in sequencer()
routine, and the code bails out from there...
It would be considerable to create a command to set the value
from the script, but trapping it late enough to be able to
know the source and destination addresses... Hmm.. (item to
add into 'BUGS' file.)
This pre-emptive ``maxReceived'' usage was prompted recently,
as somebody was creative, and used address of following type for
his source address:
user@localhost.domain
Can you guess what the IP address of it was ? Did it have
MXes ? How many rounds the message had been going before
I noticed it ? How many squirrel copies there were ? :-)
(No, my spool-disk did not quite fill up, but I wondered odd looking
hostname at the queue, and then started to notice other things..)
> \nick
/Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>