[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?

To: fair@clock.org
Subject: Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
From: Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 02:09:56 -0400
CC: mea@utu.fi, zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-reply-to: <v02140b23ae1dd94a5c14@[17.255.9.110]> (fair@clock.org)
Sender: Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>

> There are several ways to transform UUCP E-mail addresses to the Internet
> (and vice versa) successfully:
> 
>         host!user -> host!user@gateway.foo.com
>         host!user -> user%host.uucp@gateway.foo.edu
>         host!user -> user@host.org (provided an MX to gateway exists)
> 

Re- reading this, it seems easy enough to hack smtp.c to do any of
these version, why not the first. Matti will hate it, of course. Sorry
matti...

Thanks,

sdb
-- 
sdb@ssr.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi> (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:53:14 +0100)

References:
- Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
  - From: "Erik E. Fair" (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
Next by Date: Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
Prev by thread: Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
Next by thread: Re: Zmailer SMTP: Anal retentive or correct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread