[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bounce problems
On Thu, 25 Jan 1996, David Nugent wrote:
> This is cosmetic, but it is new with 2.99.25 (under Linux, kernel 1.2.13).
>
> -- start quote
> >From postmaster@server.blaze.net.au Thu Jan 25 12:27:06 1996
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 09:34:25 +1000
> From: The Post Office <postmaster@server.blaze.net.au>
> To: swanncom@blaze.net.au
> Cc: The Post Office <postoffice@server.blaze.net.au>
> Subject: Delivery problems with your mail
>
> A copy of your message is being returned to you due to difficulties
> encountered while attempting to deliver your mail.
>
> [etc..]
>
> [ Part 3: "Included Message" ]
>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 09:34:05 +1100 (EST)
> From: Swann Computers <swanncom@J>
> To: Greg Omond <flacco@werple.mira.net.au>
> Subject: test
>
> [msg omitted..]
> -- end quote
>
> Note the From: line in the "included message" section.
Does "J" appear in your config files anywhere? In "localnames"?
> As I said, this is cosmetic only since the headers in the bounce
> message itself are fine. This seems to be happening on all mail
> being bounced on our machine currently.
>
> Another problem - not a new one - I've been trying to track down
> is related to an empty FROM:<> in an smtp send resulting from a
> bounce, but I haven't had a chance to look at it yet. (Is an empty
> FROM:<> valid in SMTP? If so, then this is most likely a problem
> with the remote system).
Not only is <> valid, but it is REQUIRED as the MAIL FROM parameter on
bounced messages.
Tom
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bounce problems
- From: David Nugent <davidn@sdev.blaze.net.au> (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 03:46:01 +0200)