[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which scheduler version?

To: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
Subject: Re: Which scheduler version?
From: Marco Hernandez <marco@yukon.cren.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 10:11:58 -0400
cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 May 1995 18:06:19 PDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.950531175905.20971A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>

> 
>   Which scheduler version does everyone find to be most stable?  I've 
> been using the 2.99.10 scheduler with good results for about 5 months 
> (except for those darn bogus (hopefully!) error messages).  
> 

I've been running 2.99.13 but had to hack it a bit to get it to work.
It's been up and stable for while now ....

/Marco

References:
- Which scheduler version?
  - From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>

Prev by Date: cannot deliver to program :-(
Next by Date: smtp problem...
Prev by thread: Which scheduler version?
Next by thread: Re: Which scheduler version?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread