[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anti-relaying policy deficiencies
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 01:59:22PM +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> On 11-Aug-99 at 00:18, Teddy 'tricky' Grenman (email@example.com) wrote:
> > > rcpt to:<"firstname.lastname@example.org"@online.ru>
> > >
> > > smtpserver. May a propose a different approach: tell the router
> > > to *not* expand local part as full domain address. This way,
> > Shouldn't this have been taken care of? Atleast ChangeLog entry
> > 1999-07-20 states so. Unfortunately there seems to be something
> > wrong with it (ie. empty .forwards), but I won't say anything
> > until I've tested it properly.
> I just checked it with today's CVS - this kind of addresses are resolved
> as remote and relayed.
Like this ?
This is a collection of reports about email delivery
process concerning a message you originated:
<local "email@example.com"@mea.tmt.tele.fi "firstname.lastname@example.org"@mea.tmt.tele.fi 99>: user "email@example.com" doesn't exist
- Sync the CVS
- make clean
- make install-bin
Not *quite* that much is needed, just new router to fully cure this
/Matti Aarnio <firstname.lastname@example.org>