Re: 2.99.44 is out..

[Alexandre Sidorenko <asid@microtec.net>]

Happy New Year to everybody !

I have installed 2.99.44 on the Linux box with kernel 2.0.27 and
immediately got segfault while expanding aliases. (Sure I removed all the
old .fc files !). The new binaries work just fine with the old
'aliases.cf', so this is 'listexpand' problem. Here's a GDB output: 

(gdb) r -i
Starting program: /uuu/src/mail/zmailer-2.99.44/router/router -i
warning: Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function.
warning: GDB will be unable to debug shared library initializers
warning: and track explicitly loaded dynamic code.
ZMailer router (2.99.44 #1: Fri Dec 27 15:58:08 EST 1996)
  bin@sid:/uuu/src/mail/zmailer-2.99.44/router
Copyright 1992 Rayan S. Zachariassen
Copyright 1992-1996 Matti Aarnio

z$ router postmaster
<bin.interactive@sid.microtec.net>: address: postmaster

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
s_copy_tree (list=0x1) at listtrees.c:86
86              if (STRING(list)) {
(gdb) bt
#0  s_copy_tree (list=0x1) at listtrees.c:86
#1  0x8078f4c in s_copy_tree (list=0x80aec08) at listtrees.c:101
#2  0x8078f19 in s_copy_tree (list=0x80aebf8) at listtrees.c:96
#3  0x804e53c in run_listexpand (avl=0x80aeb78, il=0x0) at
functions.c:1341
#4  0x806eca1 in execute (c=0xbfffc01c, caller=0xbfffd020, oretcode=0, 
    name=0x8085b65 "listexpand") at execute.c:313
#5  0x8062ce2 in runcommand (c=0xbfffc01c, pc=0xbfffd020,
retcodep=0xbfffc994)
    at interpret.c:686
#6  0x806493b in interpret (code=0x80c5fc0 "\r", eocode=0x80c787e
"\016\r", 
    entry=0x80c628b "2#quad", caller=0xbfffd020, retcodep=0xbfffc994, 
    cdp=0x80b8338) at interpret.c:1638
#7  0x806f4b9 in execute (c=0xbfffd020, caller=0xbfffe024, oretcode=0, 
    name=0x8089121 "<builtin cmd>") at execute.c:424
#8  0x8062ce2 in runcommand (c=0xbfffd020, pc=0xbfffe024,
retcodep=0xbfffd9e0)
    at interpret.c:686
#9  0x806493b in interpret (code=0x80d16dc "\r", eocode=0x80d2154
"\016\r", 
    entry=0x80d17a4 "2#address", caller=0xbfffe024, retcodep=0xbfffd9e0, 
    cdp=0x80c92f4) at interpret.c:1638
#10 0x806f4b9 in execute (c=0xbfffe024, caller=0xbfffefe0, oretcode=0, 
    name=0x8089121 "<builtin cmd>") at execute.c:424
#11 0x8062ce2 in runcommand (c=0xbfffe024, pc=0xbfffefe0,
retcodep=0xbfffea2c)
    at interpret.c:686
#12 0x806493b in interpret (code=0x80b8448 "\r", eocode=0x80b8e35
"\016\r", 
    entry=0x80b8cac "2#address", caller=0xbfffefe0, retcodep=0xbfffea2c, 
    cdp=0x80b63d8) at interpret.c:1638
#13 0x806f4b9 in execute (c=0xbfffefe0, caller=0x8093e14, oretcode=0, 
    name=0x8089121 "<builtin cmd>") at execute.c:424
#14 0x8062ce2 in runcommand (c=0xbfffefe0, pc=0x8093e14,
retcodep=0xbffff99c)
    at interpret.c:686
#15 0x806493b in interpret (code=0x80dc86c "\r", eocode=0x80dc884 "", 
    entry=0x0, caller=0x8093e14, retcodep=0xbffff99c, cdp=0x80b6508)
    at interpret.c:1638
#16 0x807848c in zshtoplevel (errname=0x0) at zmsh.c:103
#17 0x804b02d in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffffa5c) at router.c:307
#18 0x804a7db in _start ()

Any ideas ?


-------------------------------------------------------------
Alexandre Sidorenko		Senior System Administrator
asid@microtec.net
Internet Microtec, Montreal, QC
-------------------------------------------------------------