[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bounce problems

To: David Nugent <davidn@sdev.blaze.net.au>
Subject: Re: Bounce problems
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 19:59:30 -0800 (PST)
cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi, Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OS2.3.91.960125131850.102N-100000@sdev.blaze.net.au>

On Thu, 25 Jan 1996, David Nugent wrote:

> > Not only is <> valid, but it is REQUIRED as the MAIL FROM parameter on 
> > bounced messages.
> 
> Sorry, I probably wasn't being clear enough. That is literally "FROM:<>"
> (actually "MAIL From:<>"), as in the address between the darts is an empty
> string. It only seems to be passed when a message is bounced.

  Yes, thats the way it is supposed to work.  You should recommend that 
site's administrator read RFC 821 and RFC 1123.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bounce problems
  - From: David Nugent <davidn@blaze.net.au> (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 10:36:00 +0200)

References:
- Re: Bounce problems
  - From: David Nugent <davidn@sdev.blaze.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Bounce problems
Next by Date: Re: Content-Length wrong?
Prev by thread: Re: Bounce problems
Next by thread: Re: Bounce problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread