Re: SPF and senderokwithdns

["Mariano Absatz" <zmailer@lists.com.ar>]

El 13 Jul 2004 a las 8:55, Eugene Crosser escribió:

> On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 14:36 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> 
>>> with your today's change, senderokwithdns check in pt_mailfrom is the
>>> very last, and it is not done if the sender is "authorized".  Is it what
>>> was your intention?  I think that if one wants to disallow unroutable
>>> "mail from", he wants to do that for all, authorized and non-authorized
>>> senders.  And therefore the check should be done very early, maybe even
>>> before "if (state->full_trust) return 0;" around the line 1704.
>> 
>> It is a wee bit complicated thing indeed..
>> 
>> When the matter is about remote SPF publisher, who want to be
>> protected, then things are as you say,  but when it is about
>> _local_ SPF set, then e.g. users must be able to send out
>> from where-ever they are, as long as they have authenticated..
> 
> Wait, wait!  I am not talking about SPF.  SPF is at the right place now.
> My note was about senderokwithdns, i.e. validity of "mail from" provided
> by the client.  I think that this check should be done regardless of all
> others, should it?
> 
I agree with Eugene on this one... I don't want non-routable return paths 
whether the user authenticated or not...

--
Mariano Absatz
El Baby
----------------------------------------------------------
Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
fighting against the two most destructive forces in the universe:
entropy and human stupidity. They're not things you can always
overcome with a "methodology" or on a schedule.
        -- Damian Conway, Perl Guru


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi