From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Wed Feb  4 20:53:16 2004
Received: from nic.funet.fi ([IPv6:::ffff:193.166.3.1]:53966 "EHLO
	nic.funet.fi" smtp-auth: <none> TLS-CIPHER: "EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA
	keybits 168/168 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: <none>)
	by mail.zmailer.org with ESMTP id S1612305AbUBDSxG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi>); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:53:06 +0200
Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand
	id S32469AbUBDSv4 (ORCPT <rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi>);
	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:51:56 +0200
Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S3350AbUBDSvz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer-outgoing>); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:51:55 +0200
Received: from chronus.sovam.com ([194.67.22.174]:35902 "EHLO
	chronus.sovam.com" smtp-auth: <none> TLS-CIPHER: <none>)
	by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id S32564AbUBDSvx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer@nic.funet.fi>); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:51:53 +0200
Received: from ariel.sovam.com ([194.67.3.216]:43699 "EHLO ariel.sovam.com")
	by chronus.sovam.com with ESMTP id S274658AbUBDSvv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer@nic.funet.fi>); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:51:51 +0300
Subject: Re: A potential way to cut down on spam.
From:	Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru>
To:	Neal Morgan <Neal@Morgan-Systems.com>
Cc:	alvin <alvin@iplink.net>, zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <S339884AbUBDSMc/20040204181232Z+798@SMTP.Morgan-Systems.com>
References: <S339884AbUBDSMc/20040204181232Z+798@SMTP.Morgan-Systems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Teleross
Message-Id: <1075920710.31943.55.camel@ariel.sovam.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date:	Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:51:51 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender:	zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Return-Path: <zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/httpd/zmailer/html/mhalist/input.sh"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi