From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Tue May 27 23:10:06 2003
Received: from nic.funet.fi ([IPv6:::ffff:193.166.3.1]:50900 "EHLO
	nic.funet.fi" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]" smtp-auth: <none> TLS-CIPHER:
	"EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA keybits 168/168 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1:
	<none>) by mail.zmailer.org with ESMTP id S261244AbTE0UKG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi>); Tue, 27 May 2003 23:10:06 +0300
Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand
	id S5916AbTE0UJr (ORCPT <rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi>);
	Tue, 27 May 2003 23:09:47 +0300
Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S5906AbTE0UJr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer-outgoing>); Tue, 27 May 2003 23:09:47 +0300
Received: (mea@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S5923AbTE0UJp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer@nic.funet.fi>); Tue, 27 May 2003 23:09:45 +0300
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2003 23:09:45 +0300
From:	Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
To:	Andrey Blochintsev <bag@iptelecom.net.ua>
Cc:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: Re: why 2.6.0 ?
Message-ID: <20030527230945.C29214@nic.funet.fi>
References: <20030527171918.C89480@pechkin.iptelecom.net.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20030527171918.C89480@pechkin.iptelecom.net.ua>; from bag@iptelecom.net.ua on Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:31:17PM +0300
Sender:	zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Return-Path: <zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/httpd/zmailer/html/mhalist/input.sh"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi