[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More info on percent hack

To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: Re: More info on percent hack
From: "Daryle A. Tilroe" <daryle@micralyne.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:01:57 -0700
Organization: Micralyne
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
References: <5DEC3FFCDE2F7C4DA45433EE09A4F22C8DFC7B@COLOSSUS.dyadem.corp> <01b201c2dd13$6be96450$490011ac@bluecatnetworks.corp> <20030226205232.E6228@nic.funet.fi>
Reply-To: daryle@micralyne.com
Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

If you use the localnames file (micralyne.com is in my localnames) and
then build smtp-policy.dat with the policy-builder.sh script you get:

"micralyne.com = _localnames"

in smtp-policy.dat; and elsewhere:

"_localnames   rejectnet - relaycustnet - localdomain + relaytarget + = 
_rbl1"

is defined with "relaytarget +".  Therefore are not all localnames 
'protected' against % hack relaying if you properly use the files
and scripts?

-- 
Daryle A. Tilroe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi

References:
- More info on percent hack
  - From: "Luke Galea" <lgalea@bluecatnetworks.com>
- Re: More info on percent hack
  - From: "Vince" <vpuzzella@bluecatnetworks.com>
- Re: More info on percent hack
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: More info on percent hack
Next by Date: not expiring ?
Prev by thread: Re: More info on percent hack
Next by thread: interpreting uucp path on smtp acceptance stage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread