[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: maillock() vs dotlock

On 15-Mar-00 at 14:23, Matti Aarnio (mea@nic.funet.fi) wrote:

> > it seems that your variant of autoconf'ing maillock does not do the
> > right thing.  With --without-maillock specified, first unconditional
> > invocation of AC_FUNC_SVR4_MAILLOCK causes HAVE_MAILLOCK to be defined
> > anyway, which is not what we want.  I think that there should be no
> > AC_FUNC_SVR4_MAILLOCK outside of AC_ARG_WITH.  Am I missing something?
>      No, my bad. Fixed in CVS.

Matti, I think that was the fastest responce ever: CVS commit TWO MINUTES
after the bug report!  Worth Guinness book! :-)