[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: maillock() vs dotlock
On 15-Mar-00 at 14:23, Matti Aarnio (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> > it seems that your variant of autoconf'ing maillock does not do the
> > right thing. With --without-maillock specified, first unconditional
> > invocation of AC_FUNC_SVR4_MAILLOCK causes HAVE_MAILLOCK to be defined
> > anyway, which is not what we want. I think that there should be no
> > AC_FUNC_SVR4_MAILLOCK outside of AC_ARG_WITH. Am I missing something?
> No, my bad. Fixed in CVS.
Matti, I think that was the fastest responce ever: CVS commit TWO MINUTES
after the bug report! Worth Guinness book! :-)