Re: A couple of short router question

[Ambrose Li <acli@mingpaoxpress.com>]

Sorry to follow up on myself. After rereading the router source
more carefully, I realize that it is not because the numbers are
too large, but because the router thinks that the message is
already locked by another process (though the process is unrelated
to mail).

Sorry for the trouble... I'll remember to mv more carefully.


On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 02:53:24PM -0400, Ambrose Li [EDP] wrote:
> After a while, I discovered the problem. It has to do with the
> length of the number. After I renamed the file names to two digits,
> all the messages are routed. Somehow, numbers that are "too large"
> are silently not routed.

-- 
Ambrose C. Li / +1 416 321 0088 / Ming Pao Newspapers (Canada) Ltd.
EDP department / All views expressed here are my own; they may or
may not represent the views of my employer or my colleagues.