[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: leading dots

To: jdg117@elvis.arl.psu.edu (John D Groenveld)
Subject: Re: leading dots
From: mea@nic.funet.fi
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:38:43 +0300 (EET DST)
Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <19980629155847Z34122-249+10@elvis.arl.psu.edu> from "John D Groenveld" at Jun 29, 98 11:58:35 am

> Matti, whats the solution to the missing leading dot problem in message body?
> Thanks,
> John
> groenveld@acm.org

Eh ?   Under what circumstances ?

In BDAT ("CHUNKING") mode the smtp did duplicate the leading dots
unnecessarily (sharing code with "DATA" phase), but with that
corrected the DATA still does line-start dot-duplication.

/Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>  (rather puzzled at the moment)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: leading dots
  - From: John D Groenveld <jdg117@elvis.arl.psu.edu> (Mon, 29 Jun 1998 22:17:21 +0300)

References:
- leading dots
  - From: John D Groenveld <jdg117@elvis.arl.psu.edu>

Prev by Date: routing mail using orcpt parameter?
Next by Date: Re: leading dots
Prev by thread: leading dots
Next by thread: Re: leading dots
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread