Re: address funny

["Andrew White" <awhite@netmediatech.com>]

>>The question I have is:
 What RFC defines the format of valid e-mail addresses?

That would be RFC 822

A
________________________________________________________________________

K. Andrew White                                 President
416.596.8520                                    netMedia Technology Inc.
x. 226                                          awhite@netmediatech.com
416.596.8610 Fax

Get netMessenger                                www.netmessenger.com
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------ Reply Separator ---------------------------------
From: Alvin Starr <alvin@iplink.net>
Subject: Re: address funny
Date: Friday, March 13, 1998 at 12:36 PM



Zmailer is rejecting the address 
"stephen_j._mcwilliam@interactivemedia.com" and I am sure that it is 
correct in rejecting the message. 

>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to mail.interactivemedia.com.:
>>>> RCPT To:<stephen_j._mcwilliam@interactivemedia.com>
><<< 501-5.5.2          ^
><<< 501 5.5.2 Path data: After a dot, something which is not alphanumeric
>554 <stephen_j._mcwilliam@interactivemedia.com>... Service unavailable

The question I have is:
 What RFC defines the format of valid e-mail addresses?


Alvin Starr                   ||   voice: (416)493-3325
Interlink Connectivity        ||   fax:   (416)493-7974
alvin@iplink.net              ||