Received: from american.com ([204.253.96.2]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <65242-15577>; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 17:41:44 +0200
Received: from hotsprings.american.com (hotsprings.american.com [204.253.96.21]) by american.com (8.7.6/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA12041 for <zmailer@nic.funet.fi>; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:41:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (pgf@localhost) by hotsprings.american.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA03487 for <zmailer@nic.funet.fi>; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:41:30 -0500
Message-Id: <199612111541.KAA03487@hotsprings.american.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: hotsprings.american.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: Re: Anti spam methodologies (is it the new frontier?) 
In-reply-to: timmo's message of Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:16:23 -0500.
	 <Pine.WNT.3.95.961211101246.236A-100000@smoke.mse.jhu.edu> 
Reply-to: pgf@american.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3485.850318889.1@hotsprings>
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:41:30 -0500
From:	Paul Fox <pgf@american.com>
Return-Path: <zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi>