Re: expn in 2.99.43b - still minor prob...

[Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>]

> expn and vrfy became much better in 2.99.43b.  Though, it does not
> always work as expected.  If you enter address without '@' sign,
> there is *no responce* from the server until you enter the next command.
> After that you get diagnistics.

Here are diffs cut&paste from an xterm, thus the TABs are scrambled,
but the change is not that big...  (A couple of missing   fflush()es)

--- ../../smtpserver/smtpserver.c~      Mon Dec  2 20:27:34 1996
+++ ../../smtpserver/smtpserver.c       Tue Dec  3 18:06:52 1996
@@ -2055,11 +2055,13 @@
                    s = rfc821_path2(cp,cfi); /* Without < > */
                  if (s == cp) {
                    type821err(501,m552,buf,"Path data: %s",rfc821_error);
+                   fflush(stdout);
                    break;
                  }
                  while (*s == ' ' || *s == '\t') ++s;
                  if (*s != 0) {
                    type(501, m552, "Growl! Extra junk after the EXPN argument!");
+                   fflush(stdout);
                    break;
                  }
                  if ((s = router(RKEY_EXPAND, 0, cp)) != NULL) {

> --
> Eugene Crosser, "Russia-On-Line" System Administrator (Sovam Teleport)
> +7 501 258 4170 mailto:crosser@online.ru http://www.online.ru/~crosser/

	/Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>