[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)

To: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
Subject: Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: 21 Nov 1996 21:53:57 +0100
Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Fake-Sender: agulbra@troll.no
In-Reply-To: Matti Aarnio's message of Thu, 21 Nov 1996 22:26:57 +0200
Organization: 42
References: <96Nov21.222658+0200_eet.60995-14990+131@nic.funet.fi>
Sender: Arnt Gulbrandsen <agulbra@troll.no>


Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
> 	Any opinnions ?

Speaking personally, I've _never_ intended to create an Apparently-To:
header, and I've intended to send mail to undisclosed recipients many
times.

So from my opinion, I wouldn't change the behaviour unless there is a
_strong_ argument in favour.

--Arnt

References:
- To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>

Prev by Date: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
Next by Date: Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
Prev by thread: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
Next by thread: Re: To do sendmailism, or not ? (Apparently-To:)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread