Matti, while you are here, plase apply the patch for a stupid bug of my. I must admit that my SPF support is problematic (works fine on Solaris, sometimes gives wrong results on Linux, I suspect a problem with libresolv), so I may come up with more changes once I figure it. Anyway, this one is obvious: Index: smtpserver/cfgread.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/zmailer/smtpserver/cfgread.c,v retrieving revision 1.60 diff -u -r1.60 cfgread.c --- smtpserver/cfgread.c 7 May 2004 00:26:16 -0000 1.60 +++ smtpserver/cfgread.c 8 Jul 2004 17:59:06 -0000 @@ -529,15 +529,15 @@ /* Reject mail if SPF query result is equal or higher than threshold */ else if (cistrcmp(name, "spf-threshold") == 0 && param1 /* 1 param */) { use_spf=1; - if (cistrcmp(param1, "fail")) { + if (cistrcmp(param1, "fail") == 0) { spf_threshold=1; /* relaxed - they say: fail but we accept */ - } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "softfail")) { + } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "softfail") == 0) { spf_threshold=2; /* default - they don't assume real reject */ - } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "none")) { + } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "none") == 0) { spf_threshold=3; /* stricter - but allow all who don't publish */ - } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "neutral")) { + } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "neutral") == 0) { spf_threshold=4; /* draconian - SFP-less won't pass */ - } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "pass")) { + } else if (cistrcmp(param1, "pass") == 0) { spf_threshold=5; /* extreme - allow only explicit 'pass' */ } else { type(NULL,0,NULL, "Cfgfile '%s' line %d param %s has bad arg: '%s'",
This is a digitally signed message part