[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: domain_aware_getpwnam - remaining issues?

To: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
Subject: Re: domain_aware_getpwnam - remaining issues?
From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:20:59 +0300
Cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <20031110160953.A25932@nic.funet.fi>
Organization: Teleross
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
References: <1068463757.26889.62.camel@ariel.sovam.com> <20031110160953.A25932@nic.funet.fi>
Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi

On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 17:09, Matti Aarnio wrote:

> Uninitalized variables will go to BSS, which C runtime will clear before
> calling  main().    In C this should be considered "given".

Wouldn't it be a "good taste" to initialize BSS variables anyway?  Just
to not depend on not well documented behavior, and taking into account
that in most other places such variables are initialized?

Eugene

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi

References:
- domain_aware_getpwnam - remaining issues?
  - From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru>
- Re: domain_aware_getpwnam - remaining issues?
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: domain_aware_getpwnam - remaining issues?
Next by Date: Re: rejecting unknown users
Prev by thread: Re: domain_aware_getpwnam - remaining issues?
Next by thread: Mailman / zmailer integration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread