Re: spamassassin

[Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@wanadoo.es>]

James MacKinnon wrote:

> In my experience, spamassassin typically takes about 1 sec/message,
> so you'd be down to about 86400 messages/day instead of 2M - you'd need 
> about 24 cpu's to handle that kind of transactional load. On really fast 
> machines you might get that cut in half, so you'd still need on the order 
> of 10 or so cpu's. [ I guess you'd need a "fast" version of spamassassin ]

ZMailer has, by default, and extensive logging ON. Maybe relaxing it could
help to spamassassin to get better I/O.

-- 
HTML mails are going to trash automagically

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi