Re: latest cvs version aka .56pre9

[Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:34:04PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Matti Aarnio wrote:
> >>is it better to stay with the more_than_two_years_old .55patch1
> >>or cvs is stable enough to run every day ? is .56 close?
> >   I had a plan to make it today.
> >   Now lets see, what other bugs can be found ..
> 
> - more bugs:
> 
> make -C man html
> make: Entering directory `/home/xose/rpmbuild/BUILD/zmailer-2.99.56/man'
> sh ./man-to-html.sh mailq.1 > mailq.1.html
> groff: invalid option -- c
> usage: groff [-abeghilpstvzCENRSUVXZ] [-Fdir] [-mname] [-Tdev] [-ffam]
>        [-wname] [-Wname] [-Mdir] [-dcs] [-rcn] [-nnum] [-olist] [-Parg]
>        [-Larg] [-Idir] [files...]
> groff -h gives more help

  That is .. odd.  My groff is 1.18.1,  and frankly, I consider
  these document transmogrifier things to be primarily for my
  zmailer.org at which I do  'make publish'  in that directory
  branch.

> - would you mind to replace old manual with the newer ?

  What do you mean with that ?

> - inn package has a sm.8 manpage too

  Damn, what would be better name ?  Considering that the utility
  is named 'sm' -- which we could rename to e.g.  smcm ?
  No doubt somebody will have a thing with that name, too.

> thanks

-- 
/Matti Aarnio	<mea@nic.funet.fi>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi