Re: latest cvs version aka .56pre9

[Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:55:13AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> hi folks,
> 
> Red Hat 7.3 + ZMailer CVS(Mon Aug 25 00:38:41 CEST 2003)
> 
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib
>  --includedir=/usr/include/zmailer --with-zconfig=/etc/zmailer/zmailer.conf
>  --with-mailbox=/var/spool/mail --with-postoffice=/var/spool/postoffice
>  --with-mailshare=/etc/zmailer --with-mailvar=/etc/zmailer
>  --with-mailbin=/usr/libexec/zmailer --with-logdir=/var/log/zmailer
>  --with-sendmailpath=/usr/sbin/sendmail --with-vacationpath=/usr/bin/vacation
>  --with-rmailpath=/usr/bin/rmail --with-nntpserver=news --with-system-malloc
>  --with-ta-mmap

  Nice to see that 'ta-mmap' option works, but I would not use it,
  if I were you -- its performance benefits are dubious.
  Todo: that feature should be runtime selectable...

> I got this:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/xose/rpmbuild/BUILD/zmailer-2.99.56/transports/smtp'
> gcc -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./../../include -I../../include -I../..    -c -o smtp.o smtp.c
> smtp.c: In function `ehlo_check':
> smtp.c:2239: `ESMTP_STARTTLS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> smtp.c:2239: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> smtp.c:2239: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [smtp.o] Error 1

  Ah, damn.  Fix is easy enough.

> is it better to stay with the more_than_two_years_old .55patch1
> or cvs is stable enough to run every day ? is .56 close?

  I had a plan to make it today.
  Now lets see, what other bugs can be found ..

> thanks,
-- 
/Matti Aarnio	<mea@nic.funet.fi>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi