From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat Jun 28 14:14:40 2003
Received: from nic.funet.fi ([IPv6:::ffff:193.166.3.1]:32419 "EHLO
	nic.funet.fi" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]" smtp-auth: <none> TLS-CIPHER:
	"EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA keybits 168/168 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1:
	<none>) by mail.zmailer.org with ESMTP id S266992AbTF1LOk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi>); Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:14:40 +0300
Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand
	id S9433AbTF1LOb (ORCPT <rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi>);
	Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:14:31 +0300
Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S8961AbTF1LOb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer-outgoing>); Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:14:31 +0300
Received: (mea@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id S6398AbTF1LO3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;zmailer@nic.funet.fi>); Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:14:29 +0300
Date:	Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:14:29 +0300
From:	Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
To:	"Marc A. Pelletier" <marc@ctrl-alt-del.ca>
Cc:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: Re: Proposed ESMTP extension to help lessen the impact of spam
Message-ID: <20030628141429.V17711@nic.funet.fi>
References: <200306280605.53057.marc@ctrl-alt-del.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <200306280605.53057.marc@ctrl-alt-del.ca>; from marc@ctrl-alt-del.ca on Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 06:16:22AM +0000
Sender:	zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Return-Path: <zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/httpd/zmailer/html/mhalist/input.sh"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi
Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi