Re: X-Orcpt headers and direct procmail delivery

["Daryle A. Tilroe" <daryle@micralyne.com>]

Thanks Matti.  Since I am loath to upgrade a working, production,
system I'll just use "O" rather than upgrading to get "e".  It
basically gives me what I need; to wit, an indication of the final
recipient of trapped spam without an individual in the "To:"
header.

--
Daryle A. Tilroe

Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:10:12AM -0700, Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
> 
>>Great!  That gives me "X-Orcpt:" which was my main concern.
>>Just out of curiosity what about "X-Envelope-To:" or
>>"Original-Recipient:"?
>>
>>My sm procmail line now reads:
>>
>>"procm   sSPOfn  /usr/bin/procmail       procmail -a $h -d $u"
>>
>>is there anything else silly I am missing?
> 
> 
> Instead of 'O' you want 'e'  ("man sm" will explain
> or see:  http://www.zmailer.org/man/sm.8.html )
> 
> You will also want newer version, than  2002-Sep-2, when
> the necessary code was added.
> 
> 
>>Thanks!
>>
>>PS. In my second, slightly modified, email I made a mistake;
>>the "Return-Path:" header WAS correctly being tacked on.
> 
> 
> Proper MTAs strip away Return-Path  headers, as they are realm of
> local delivery, only..  (And I have approved a few of your emails
> which have been trapped into my former anti-spam rules.)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi