[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zmailer to Exchange bug ?
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Mark Visser <mark@dnd.utwente.nl>
> > Hence.. read smtp instead of smtpserver please. Nevertheless it's still
> > BDAT at stake, and i'll certainly try the disabling of it, but as we have
> > offered it so long and the old release 2.99.51 didn't had hanging smtp's i
> > didn't directly thought of disabling it.
>
> Well, it might have been broken when LMTP or (less likely) TLS support was
> introduced in the code. I don't know whether either of those were added
> after 2.99.51, though.
>
> You can offer it in your smtpserver even though your smtp won't use it
> when offered.
As Matti and you were confused by smtpserver vs. smtp by my mail, a
collegae reminded me we get hanging smtpservers also regularly and
sometimes smtp (*deep deep sigh, confusion all over).
To get it straight once and for all.
From a ETRN box that was fully restarted on 13 may we have now:
ps -ef | grep smtpserver | awk '{print $5" "$6}' | sort | uniq -c
22 May 13
112 May 14
41 May 15
23 May 16
38 May 17
26 May 18
8 May 19
the ta/smtp's on this box are all recent (last x hours)
Zmailer 2.99.55
Kids: 33 Idle: 6 Msgs: -311225 Thrds: 1263 Rcpnts: 13361 Uptime:
12d2h
As for these hanging ones, they are BDAT sessions sending TO us, from
those Exchange boxes mentioned earlier. So, one of the 2 sides doesn't
close it.
I've disabled CHUNKING now on one box, will see what happens.
Mark
--
Warning: You can get rid of all the bugs by disabling them from the main menu.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi