From zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Mon May 20 19:34:05 2002 Received: from nic.funet.fi ([IPv6:::ffff:193.166.3.1]:18683 "EHLO nic.funet.fi" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER: ) by mail.zmailer.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:34:05 +0300 Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:33:59 +0300 Received: (majordom@nic.funet.fi) by nic.funet.fi id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:33:58 +0300 Received: from netlx010.civ.utwente.nl ([130.89.1.92]:35698 "EHLO netlx010.civ.utwente.nl" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: ) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:33:57 +0300 Received: from ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl (ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl [130.89.175.240]) by netlx010.civ.utwente.nl (8.11.4/HKD) with ESMTP id g4KGXu026794; Mon, 20 May 2002 18:33:56 +0200 Received: from localhost (mark@localhost) by ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id SAA24698; Mon, 20 May 2002 18:33:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:33:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Mark Visser To: Arnt Gulbrandsen cc: Matti Aarnio , Subject: Re: Zmailer to Exchange bug ? In-Reply-To: <20020520123751.T1042@melkebalanse.gulbrandsen.priv.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: zmailer@nic.funet.fi Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/httpd/zmailer/html/mhalist/input.sh"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi Original-Recipient: rfc822;zmailer-log@nic.funet.fi