[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does Zmailer fork?

To: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
Subject: Re: Does Zmailer fork?
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:28:47 +0200
Cc: Philip Mak <pmak@aaanime.net>, zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <20010627110622.F15960@nic.funet.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106270322400.4119-100000@sg1.indexthis.net> <20010627110622.F15960@nic.funet.fi>
Sender: zmailer-owner@nic.funet.fi

Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
>    It is slow, but if you absolutely can't have more than 10 or so
>    processes, that is about the only setup you can have.
> 
>    For message receiving the sendmail does fork for each incoming
>    message.

Well, it's possible to have sendmail started from inetd (sendmail -bs) and
then inetd can limit the number if comining connections.

That said, if 100 is possible the zmailer will fit nicely and IMO run much
better than sendmail.

--Arnt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe zmailer" in
the body of a message to majordomo@nic.funet.fi

References:
- Does Zmailer fork?
  - From: Philip Mak <pmak@aaanime.net>
- Re: Does Zmailer fork?
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Does Zmailer fork?
Next by Date: scheduler dies ...
Prev by thread: Re: Does Zmailer fork?
Next by thread: scheduler dies ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread