Re: 4xx responce from a remote delays *all* mail to that host?

[Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>]

On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:34:08PM +0300, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> >      It is semi-intentional.
> >      Well, not quite.
> > 
> >      Intention was to spend as little effort on poorly responding
> >      systems as possible, but the way to signal connection failure
> >      and MAIL FROM 4** are too similar :-/
> 
> Well, OK, any advice then?  Or plans to change this?

	See my TODO file at the CVS.

	I don't know when I have time to do something about them.

> Eugene

-- 
/Matti Aarnio	<mea@nic.funet.fi>