[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newbie: Slow scheduling?
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > Hi, I'm using Zmailer 2.99.50-s19, and everything seems to work, but I've
> > noticed that it's a bit slow:
> > Jun 29 09:36:00 calix router: S.rS5RM104048:
> > from=<email@example.com>, rrelay=dani@localhost size=327, nrcpts=1,
> > msgid=<19990629093552.A2361@calix.enpl.es>
> > Jun 29 09:36:10 calix mailbox: S.rS5RM104048: to=<dani>,
> > delay=00:00:18, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, stat=ok3 Ok
> Yes and no. Sendmail is monolithic program doing all by itself
> from message submission to driving the final delivery.
> Thus sendmail is fast for doing its job, but on the other hand,
> when there is *lots of* separate emails to deliver, you can all
> the sudden have lots of running 'sendmail' processes, and then
> your system load skyrockets without limits...
Mm.. it's true.. :) I've tried this perl script:
open MAIL, "|mail dani";
print MAIL "Hi!";
If I run it under the Ultra-1 and sendmail, it never ends.. because it
keeps delivering them one by one and doing all the job.
From the Pentium Pro running ZMailer, I can set counter to 5000, and
have all them delivered in 2 or 3 minutes.
So for each message, the delay is higher in zmailer, but the speed (in
messages per second) under ZMailer is *much* faster.
I've done it all locally -no network- and just one smtp conection at
time. I guess that if I had many simultaneous conections, the results
would be even more impressive :)
Thanks for the info, It has been very helpful.
Keep on the good job,
Dani Pardo, firstname.lastname@example.org
PS: I think I'll forgive all that R$*<@$%y>$* $#ether $@$2 $:$1<@$2>$3 :-)