[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: zmailer too restrictive

To: Tom <tom@sdf.com>
Subject: Re: zmailer too restrictive
From: "Erik E. Fair" (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 15:33:56 -0700
Cc: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>, Sven Goldt <goldt@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>, zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971013143319.15227B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
References: <19971009101714Z12356-2937+6283@nic.funet.fi>

RFC821 is not the last word. It is further modified by RFC1123 ("Host
Requirements").

	Erik <fair@clock.org>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zmailer too restrictive
  - From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 02:32:40 +0300)

References:
- Re: zmailer too restrictive
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
- Re: zmailer too restrictive
  - From: Tom <tom@sdf.com>

Prev by Date: Re: No 'mailq' tcp service defined!
Next by Date: Re: zmailer too restrictive
Prev by thread: Re: zmailer too restrictive
Next by thread: Re: zmailer too restrictive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread