[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump

To: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>
Subject: Re: 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump
From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@online.ru>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 15:17:03 +0400 (MSD)
cc: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
In-Reply-To: <19970703205954Z2212-5117+32@nic.funet.fi>
Reply-To: Eugene Crosser <crosser@online.ru>
Sender: crosser@ariel.sovam.com

>      * router/libdb/headers.c:
>          Allow   "Reply-To:" and "Resent-Reply-To:" to have value: "<>"
>          (sigh...)

Matti, I beleive that this form is *not* legal by RFC822.  I examined this
problem quite thoroughly when I needed to direct replies to nowhere.
"Reply-To: <>" is illegal (while "Reply-To: Any comment :;" is legal).

(Although, stupid sendmail will corrupt both forms beyond recognition :-( )

Eugene

References:
- 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi>

Prev by Date: 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump
Next by Date: Re: 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump
Prev by thread: 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump
Next by thread: Re: 2.99.49 patch3 -- only full dump
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread