[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
.49, spam
ZMailer 2.99.49 looks very good (thanks, Matti), but I'm feeling a
little down at the moment.
The fourth message coming in after I upgraded my real mail server to
2.99.49p2 was spam. 1, 2, 3, spam. Didn't even take a minute.
The message came from something like <1fvdf@ejfvsd.afhdjalf3.vmx>, and
I don't see any way to reject things like that. Could smtpserver do
an MX/A lookup of the envelope sender domain? Would that be a bad
idea?
I know about -sf, but that seems like policy ("we ignore mail from
such and such domain"), not a DNS query.
Btw, this patch ought to make policy-builder.sh a little better.
--- utils/policy-builder.sh Sat Jun 28 16:10:22 1997
+++ /local/zmailer/bin/policy-builder.sh Sat Jun 28 16:50:02 1997
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
# (We use file from "http://www.webeasy.com:8080/spam/spam_download_table"
# which is intended for QMAIL, and thus needs to be edited..)
if [ -f smtp-policy.spam ] ; then
- cat smtp-policy.spam | \
+ cat smtp-policy.spam | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-a]' | grep -v '[^-/\.a-zA-Z0-9@]' \
awk '/^@/{ # Domain, but ZMailer processes them without '@'
printf "%s = _bulk_mail\n", substr($1,2);
next;
The tr handles things like cyber-s-i-q.com vs. cyber-S-I-Q.com, the
grep (untested, I did that by hand) should grep away stuff zmailer
won't digest, "bhaffle,wuyffle.com" for example (note comma).
--Arnt
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .49, spam
- From: Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi> (Sun, 29 Jun 1997 04:51:08 +0300)