[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: db question and portability.h patch
> Solaris 2.6 ? Early-Access beta ?
> I have to ask an account at an Sol2.6EA machine we
> have at my work.. I didn't think there was any
> high priority at getting the ZMailer running in it :)
Yeah, we're on the EA program. Solaris 2.6 seems pretty decent so far,
I've had more troubles with gcc-2.7.2.2... web server performance in
particular is quite a bit better than Solaris 2.5.1, though I haven't
compared to 2.5.1+ISS. Anyway...
> Anyway, the autoconf(ig) isn't very good at finding
> things automatically when they are in abnormal positions.
> "abnormal" in this context is /usr/local/ instead
> of /usr/ ... How many alternate trees should be
> supported automatically, and when to add one more
> --with-bsd-db-include=
> --with-bsd-db-lib=
> or some such ?
Well, the problem appears to be a bit more subtle than I originally
thought - I copied the db.h file to /usr/include just for kicks and the
configure script still doesn't find it! I had to mangle the db.h file a
little bit to get db-1.8.5 to compile with gcc-2.7.2.2 (problem with a new
int_types.h file - actually, I get warnings about it when compiling
zmailer too but no errors), but not too seriously. What can I do here?
- donald