[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in .48-970407 reports
> Just a few minutes ago I installed .48-970407 and had to rollback
> immediately because of the following trouble: non-delivery reports
> look like this:
Hmm... Yes, transports/libta/ctlopen.c has one
instance of setting the headeroffset -- that is
"two under".
But why does the status info be blank ?
What the real error was ? There might (after all)
be a loophole where the information for the messages
were not set for the notary.
/Matti Aarnio
> --A41E5.860519815=_/deimos
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> This is a collection of reports about email delivery
> process concerning a message you originated:
>
> <smtp kvazar.kmicro.com Yas@kvazar.kmicro.com 60001>:
>
> --A41E5.860519815=_/deimos
> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; deimos
> Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:34:57 +0400
>
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;Yas@kvazar.kmicro.com
> Final-Recipient: RFC822;Yas@kvazar.kmicro.com
> Action:
> Status:
> Diagnostic-Code:
> Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 21:16:43 +0400
>
> --A41E5.860519815=_/deimos
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
>
> m
> Received: from marceau.fm.intel.com ([132.233.247.8]) by deimos.sovam.com with
> E
> SMTP id <228153-268>; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:35:01 +0400
> Received: from fmmail.fm.intel.com by marceau.fm.intel.com (8.8.4/10.0i); Mon,
> 7
> Apr 1997 10:34:43 GMT
>
> [skipped]
>
> First, there is no error description in the report. Second, there is a
> line with a single character 'm' in the attached original message (and
> it is thus an invalid rfc822 message).
>
> Eugene
>