[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

2.99.41 scheduler

To: zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: 2.99.41 scheduler
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 20:30:29 -0800 (PST)



  Does anyone else find that the 2.99.41 scheduler's process size is much
larger than 2.99.38?  On systems I've tried, the 2.99.41 scheduler's
process size is about 8500K, while the 2.99.38 scheduler's process size is
only about 2500K.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.99.41 scheduler
  - From: Matti Aarnio <mea@utu.fi> (Mon, 18 Nov 1996 11:17:32 +0200)
- Re: 2.99.41 scheduler
  - From: Peter Ziobrzynski <pzi@netmediatech.com> (Mon, 18 Nov 1996 17:08:20 +0200)

Prev by Date: Re: z-mailer segfaults when given 'debug' after 'verb'
Next by Date: Re: 2.99.41 scheduler
Prev by thread: Re: z-mailer segfaults when given 'debug' after 'verb'
Next by thread: Re: 2.99.41 scheduler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread