Re: transports directory

[Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>]

On Fri, 7 Jul 1995, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> Scheme interpreters are a dime a dozen, and several are very suitable as
> embedded extension languages.  Not to mention that the language has a
> *real* standard.  There are many volumes of documentation available.

  Which scheme implemenation would you recommend?  I have mit-scheme, but 
it was severly hacked in the porting process and seems rather unsuitable 
for embedded applications.

> programming in it is also a pre-requisite skill for any system
> administrator, thus it is an equally good candidate for an extension
> language, and thus still a good choice for zmailer.

  I rarely find the need to do sh programming for system administration.

Tom