[Raw Msg Headers][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

forwarded comment from comp.mail.sendmail on zmailer vs sendmail



Egad! In your copious free time, Matti, care to put zmailer through gprof ;-)

	Mark, not a postmaster anymore...

------- Forwarded Message

> Received: from mserv1.dl.ac.uk (mserv1.dl.ac.uk [148.79.160.65]) by birch.ims.disa.mil (8.6.9/DISA 0.5.1) with ESMTP id XAA22074 for <brad@birch.ims.disa.mil>; Sat, 4 Feb 1995 23:03:52 -0500
> Resent-From: server-daemon@dl.ac.uk
> Received: by mserv1.dl.ac.uk id EAA18156
> 	(8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@dl.ac.uk] for dl.ac.uk from server-daemon@dl.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Feb 1995 04:01:36 GMT
> Received: by mserv1.dl.ac.uk id EAA18135
> 	(8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@dl.ac.uk] for dl.ac.uk from server-daemon@dl.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Feb 1995 04:00:33 GMT
> Received: by mserv1.dl.ac.uk id DAA17982
> 	(8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@dl.ac.uk] for dl.ac.uk from news@dl.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Feb 1995 03:57:15 GMT
> Date: 1 Feb 1995 18:53:10 GMT
> Resent-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 95 0:0:35 UT
> Message-ID: <95250035.~INN-SGLa00165.comp-news@dl.ac.uk>
> Resent-Message-ID: <3golam$grk@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
> Precedence: list
> From: jwh2@cornell.edu (James W. Howell)
> Reply-To: jwh2@cornell.edu (James W. Howell)
> Sender: "comp.mail.sendmail mail newsgroup" <server-daemon@dl.ac.uk>
> To: "comp.mail.sendmail mail newsgroup" <comp-news@dl.ac.uk>
> Subject: Kudos to Eric, Sendmail beats Zmailer in performance.
> Comments: List problems/queries to <D.P.Hines@dl.ac.uk>
> Comments: To mail both the group and netnews send to (comp-mail-sendmail@dl.ac.uk)
> X-Article-Number: comp.mail.sendmail Msg # 6704
> X-Listpath: comp-news
> X-Mailer: MXT V 12.16.1
> Status: R
> 
> My hat is off to Eric Allman.  Recently we switched our mail hub machine 
> from Zmailer to Sendmail 8.6.9.  With Zmailer the machine was running at 
> capacity, in constant I/O wait, and couldn't process the mail as fast as it 
> came in.  The best Zmailer could do was around 4,500 messages an hour.  With 
> Sendmail 8.6.9 the machine is only running at around 1/3  to 1/2 capacity 
> processing 6,000 messages an hour.  The machine in question is a Sun Sparc 
> 10 model 51 running SunOS 4.1.3.  The difference is incredible!!!!
> Jim

------- End of Forwarded Message